🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase Black history and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.