🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.